By Donald H. Harrison
SAN DIEGO — Evidently Assembly Majority Leader Toni Atkins, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, San Diego City Council President Todd Gloria and Vince Hall, who resigned Friday as Mayor Bob Filner’s chief of staff, are privy to information they don’t feel the public is entitled to know.
All four of these powerful Democrats on Friday joined the ranks of those calling for Filner’s resignation, Gonzalez telling a press conference that she has talked to some unidentified women who were “physically and verbally harassed in the work place” by the mayor. However, she gave no details and the women thus far have not come forward.
Atkins, who joined her at the press conference, said if Filner cannot declare his innocence, he should step down as mayor. She added that she was concerned that the “mayor’s ability to lead this city has been compromised.”
In response, Filner issued a statement late Friday saying that while he had acted inappropriately toward members of his staff, he was innocent of sexual harassment.
Atkins, Gonzalez, Gloria and Hall placed themselves in the same ranks as three Republicans on the City Council who previously had called for Filner’s resignation: Kevin Faulconer, Lorie Zapf and Scott Sherman.
We probably shouldn’t be too surprised by Gonzalez’ stance; she is, after all, the sister of Marco Gonzalez, one of the attorneys who on Thursday appeared at a press conference with former City Councilwoman Donna Frye to allege that incidents of sexual harassment by Filner had occurred and to call on Filner to step down. The other lawyer at that press conference was Cory Briggs.
Following the Frye press conference, Filner distributed on Thursday a videotaped apology in which he said he had misbehaved towards women–without giving any specifics– and promised to enlist help to reform his behavior. Any hope he might have had to staunch the criticism of his actions ended with the Friday press conference by the two Assembly members, Hall’s resignation, and the resignation call from Gloria, who would become the acting mayor if Filner steps down.
Meanwhile, City Attorney Jan Goldsmith–who has battled Filner on numerous other fronts — said that so far he has received no specific information, or claim, or name of any alleged victim of Filner’s rumored misdeeds.
The atmosphere around City Hall was not unlike that of a lynch mob, in which rumors have been substituted for facts, and hearsay is offered instead of evidence, apparently in an effort to poison public opinion against Filner. Meanwhile, news organizations were out in the field polling San Diegans on whether they thought the mayor should resign.
And still, as the frenzy of the media following in the lead of self-interested politicians continues, we, the voters, are not given one shred of evidence. Not one person who would like to topple the mayor is willing to stand up and give us the details. Why don’t the alleged victims speak up? Are they afraid that they would be subject to retaliation from the mayor? That fear is ridiculous. Filner is under the microscope. He is going to be as circumspect as possible. So what is it really that these alleged victims are afraid of? Could it be that they are making political mountains out of personal molehills?
The public has a right to know.
We, the public, should not stand for this attempted coup d’etat by political insiders. We must demand facts, facts, and more facts. And if the plaintiffs and their lawyers and high-powered political allies refuse to produce those facts, then we have to assume that Filner’s admitted misbehavior–whatever it was — did not sink to the level to warrant his resignation.
It’s been a tough, humiliating week for Bob Filner. But I hope he will remain steadfast in the mayor’s office, concentrate on the city’s business, and force those who would trade in innuendo to come clean with the voters.
*
Harrison is editor of San Diego Jewish World. He may be contacted via donald.harrison@sdjewishworld.com
Notice how nobody is talking about the $25 million FY-2014 Budget Hole. That is because there is $1 Billion in former CCDC Civic San Diego Redevelopment Agency (RDA) assets being hoarded by Civic San Diego under operational control of City Council President Todd Gloria.
http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2013/jun/19/citylights1-will-civic-san-diego-help-truly-needy/
Due to the end of RDA statewide, the Department of Finance (DOF) is freezing access to the majority of former RDA Tax Increment funds until later this summer 2013.
http://tinyurl.com/20130612
Linked above is our solution to the problem which requires our Strong Mayor Filner to bypass the City Attorney and City Council through a Mayoral Executive Order to move all $292.9 million is Successor Housing Entity assets into our San Diego Affordable Housing Fund and/or the Housing Trust Fund (HTF). This will move operational control of our housing assets to the San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC) from Civic San Diego’s self-serving administration. Then Mayor Filner will need State approval from Sacramento, instead of hoping Goldsmith’s several legally flawed RDA lawsuits filed in our capitol will prevail.
City Attorney Goldsmith’s flawed and purposeful misinterpretation Redevelopment Agency (RDA) of Legal Memorandum MS-59 entitled “Use of Redevelopment Agency Funds for Social Service Programs or Operation of Homeless Shelters” dated May 21, 2010, outlawed the use of Redevelopment Agency (RDA) Tax Increment (TI) for homeless services. And confirmed his legal opinion that RDA TI could not be used outside the downtown Project Area for Affordable Housing and Homeless solutions.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_fHftxFXFhyN2RiNWZkM2ItZjkxZC00YjUyLWE4MTItMGRlODgxMjhhODM1/edit
Goldsmith’s is also giving Civic San Diego legal backup to say nothing can be added to ROPS spreadsheets? The ROPS spreadsheets have already been modified to include new allocations for Hotel Metro and Atmosphere? Plus $20 to $30 million.
Forbidding over $1 Billion in RDA Tax Increment (TI) to end Homelessness in San Diego has caused hardships and harm. This year an infant died due to lack of funding.
Ben — Thank you for writing. You say that KPBS reports that the allegations involve kissing and groping. From this hearsay, you go on to state: “We know the mayor was sexual with his staff…” I think we know someone may have said this is the case, but we don’t know what really happened. If you were sitting on a jury, would you say there is sufficient evidence to convict Bob of anything? — Don
Don — I agree, it would be nice to each individually be able to evaluate the specifics of the allegations. At the same time, I know what sort of circus that creates and how horrible it can be — essentially re-victimizing victims.
I think we have enough facts to know that Filner needs to resign:
(1) Bob’s own statement acknowledging that he has behaved in an inappropriate sexual way: http://media.nbcsandiego.com/documents/STICKNEY221.pdf
(2) KPBS reporting that it included kissing & groping http://www.kpbs.org/audioclips/18811/
(3) Highly credible Democratic allies of the Mayor that are now calling for his resignation after speaking with victims: Donna Frye, Lorena Gonzalez, Todd Gloria, & David Alvarez. These are not political enemies. These are the people that were most critical to him getting elected in the first place.
We know the Mayor was sexual with staff. We know some details of what that entailed. We know that close political allies were so disturbed with what else they found out, they called for his resignation.
Isn’t that enough? Do we really need the Ken Starr style lurid details?