By Dorothea Shefer-Vanson
MEVASSERET ZION, Israel — Like most – if not all – of my friends, I was disappointed by the outcome of Israel’s recent general election. Perhaps I was not quite as disappointed as some of them, as I had been expecting a result along the lines of what actually transpired. I still remember the night about ten years ago when ‘we went to bed with Peres and woke up with Netanyahu.’ It is not only the pre-election polls that are deceptive (has anyone ever told those pollsters about taking a representative random sample?), the actual results are not final until every last vote has been counted, and some of those are sent from abroad by diplomats and other service personnel and can have a significant effect on the result.
Some friends confess to being ‘clinically depressed’ by the result, and deeply worried for Israel’s future, and more pertinently, the future of our children and grandchildren. I grant that those are legitimate concerns, but at this stage, having cast our vote and fulfilled our democratic duty, there is little more we can do, and worrying isn’t going to help.
The bottom line seems to be that Israel is no longer the open, liberal country with a social conscience that it was intended to be, and essentially was to begin with. Both the sociological composition of the population and the geopolitical situation around us have changed, and it is impossible to remain stuck in the same mindset as we were over sixty years ago.
One radical change is embodied in the fact that the people who founded the State, the kibbutzniks who tilled the soil and worked day and night to make the land flourish, were made pariahs by the hate-filled rhetoric of right-wing leaders, starting with the sainted Menachem Begin. In fact, the rhetoric of hatred has generally been the prime instrument of the leaders of Israel’s right-wing parties. It led to the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, and just now, as we went to vote in the recent election, it was used by Bibi Netanyahu to garner votes.
That approach, which is supported by what is evidently the majority of voters, is based on a combination of genuine security considerations and the sense of injustice felt by that segment of the population that regards itself as disadvantaged. The people who voted for Netanyahu may well be disadvantaged, but little has been done to improve their lot by the Likud party in the last ten years – and in many cases their situation is worse today than it ever was under a party with socialist leanings.
It has been posited that the situation in Israel today is akin to one of tribalism – there is the orthodox tribe, the disadvantaged tribe, the prosperous tribe, and the Arab tribe – and each one hates and either despises or envies the other. That is a view to which I prefer not to subscribe, though it cannot be denied that at election time the differences between the various segments of Israel’s population are cultivated and exploited by the political parties of the right.
Security matters aside, the vision of egalitarianism and enlightenment that was the banner held aloft by Israel’s founding generation, and to achieve which they were prepared to make sacrifices and endure discomfort, has been trampled underfoot by the combination of economic policies that promote self-interest and an ideology that pays little heed to caring for those less fortunate. Many of those who voted for Netanyahu will continue to remain disadvantaged and will have no one to blame but themselves.
*
Shefer-Vanson is an author and freelance writer based in the Jerusalem suburb of Mevasseret Zion, Israel. Your comment may be sent to dorothea.shefer@sdjewishworld.com or posted on this website, per the instructions below.
__________________________________________________________________
Care to comment? San Diego Jewish World is intended as a forum for the entire Jewish community, whatever your political leanings. Letters may be posted below provided they are responsive to the article that prompted them, and civil in their tone. Ad hominem attacks against any religion, country, gender, race, sexual orientation, or physical disability will not be considered for publication. Letters must be signed with your first and last name, and you must state your city and state of residence. There is a limit of one letter per writer on any given day.
__________________________________________________________________
The author frankly discerns the state of mind of her friends, following the decisive victory of the life camp in the Israeli elections, as ‘clinically depressed’. This diagnosis says it all. The self-deceptive hate campaign of the anti-Zionist leftist minority in Israel and its huge supporters world wide, waged against the life craving majority in Israel, was soundly rebuffed. Rebuffed, but not as to opening their eyes to admit the conspicuous facts on the ground and to truly cite basic historical facts. The deplorable result is the wholly distorted and lopsided account here. I hope someone takes the time to call here the true contemporary sociological fabric of Israel, and the changing orientation of the Kibbiutzim and their members in it.
— Gadi Eshel, Nofit, Israel
J.J Surbeck of San Diego writes: Typically, the author doesn’t even mention what is in fact the central reason explaining Netanyahu’s success: the Palestinians. Their refusal to make any concessions, their constant attacks, their corruption, their dysfunctional double-headed “government”, one of which has triggered three wars in the last five years, their lies, their hate culture, etc… You want to talk about hate? Before accusing the right of that sin, look no further than the Palestinians and you will understand why a majority of Israelis have shifted to the right over the years. The delusional left that brought two intifadas and Oslo is as stubborn as the Palestinians in refusing to admit that they were wrong and made mistakes. Whining about their loss is not going to change their electoral chances in the future. Awakening to reality will
Dorothea Shefer-Vanson lives in a dream world. Kibbutzim diminished due to rot from within not from some outside influences. When some found they could receive just as their comrades, but without having to work as hard, the decline began. Israel has evolved from a system that did not work too well to one gives the most reward to the most people, with incentives to those who work the hardest. Socialism only works if everyone is very idealistic, which is never the case. — Jerome Liner, Cincinnati, Ohio
This commentary is rather selective. Far fewer Israelis choose to live in kibbutzim for a number of practical reasons. The economy has a large tech sector. I’d rather have unequal wealth than an equal low standardized. You cannot have a safety net redistributing wealth unless you create wealth inthe first place. Without decent economic growth, you will have much resistance to further redistribution.Just look at the last several years in the US under Obama. — East Rockaway, New York