By Rabbi Michael Leo Samuel
CHULA VISTA, California — Our universe continues to surprise us with its unexpected celestial beauty. On Monday, April 8, many of us participated in watching an event that is fairly rare, a full solar eclipse. When these phenomena occur, there is always a potential for danger. People may look at the eclipse and go blind, not realizing that they might be harming their vision. Every time a solar eclipse occurs, there are always some people who make that mistake.
I was playing tennis this morning and many of us felt a little nervous hitting a high ball across the court because we didn’t want anyone to look up towards the sun.
The human narrative is tragically interwoven with conflict and unexpected dangers. From the dawn of civilization, battles have been waged over land, resources, and ideology. Yet, amidst the clash of steel and roar of battle cries, moments of unexpected peacefulness have emerged. These moments, often sparked by unforeseen events, offer a glimmer of hope and a crucial reminder of our collective yearning for peace.
Herodotus, the ancient Greek historian hailed as the “Father of History,” documented one such remarkable instance in his seminal work, Histories. Here, he recounts the story of the Battle of Halys River, a five-year struggle between the Lydians and the Medes. This seemingly endless conflict reached a dramatic turning point during a fierce battle, when a sudden solar eclipse plunged the battlefield into darkness.
The warriors, accustomed to the harsh glare of the sun, were struck with awe and even fear by this celestial phenomenon. Herodotus, though not explicitly stating a warning, suggests the astronomer Thales of Miletus had predicted the eclipse. Whether through prior knowledge or sheer coincidence, the eclipse’s timing had a profound impact. The fighting ceased, replaced by a stunned silence as both sides grappled with the unexpected turn of events. (Herodotus, Histories, Book 1:74)
This dramatic pause in hostilities presented a unique opportunity. Mediators from neighboring regions, sensing a shift in the battlefield’s energy, seized the moment. Negotiations commenced, and ultimately, a peace treaty was forged. To solidify this newfound peace, a marriage alliance was established between the warring parties, a symbolic gesture of unity and a commitment to a future free from conflict.
The story of the Battle of Halys River, while potentially embellished with the passage of time, offers valuable insights into the delicate interplay between war and peace. It highlights the potential for unforeseen events, in this case a celestial phenomenon, to disrupt the course of conflict and create an opening for diplomacy.
However, the historical context of the Battle of Halys River requires careful consideration. The conflict was a regional dispute, a far cry from the potentially global ramifications of a war in the Middle East today. Additionally, the eclipse, a natural event beyond human control, stands in stark contrast to war, a deliberate act fueled by complex political and historical factors.
The destructive power of modern warfare also dwarfs that of ancient battles. The sophisticated weaponry and potential use of chemical or biological agents present a terrifying prospect that the warriors of Halys River could scarcely have imagined.
Despite these caveats, the core message of the story remains relevant. Unforeseen events can serve as a catalyst for peace. Just as the eclipse forced the combatants at Halys River to re-evaluate their priorities, a potential war between Israel and Iran could have unforeseen consequences that might encourage both sides to seek a peaceful resolution.
The Power of Belief and the Skepticism of Reason
The story of the eclipse and its impact on the Battle of Halys River raises a fascinating question: How do people interpret celestial phenomena? In the ancient world, such events were often viewed as omens, messages from the divine realm that could influence the course of human affairs.
This perspective is reflected in the Hebrew Bible, where the prophet Jeremiah cautions against being “dismayed at the signs of the heavens” (Jeremiah 10:2). This passage, along with others found in Judaic texts like the Mekhilta de-Rabbi Ishmael and the Tosefta, emphasizes a rejection of celestial omens and a focus on faith in God’s providence, a belief that the fate of Israel is not dictated by the stars.
This skepticism toward celestial omens stands in contrast to the awe and fear experienced by the warriors at Halys River. However, it’s important to recognize that these seemingly opposing viewpoints are not mutually exclusive. Humanity has always grappled with the tension between reason and faith, the desire for scientific explanation and the yearning for a deeper spiritual connection.
The eclipse at Halys River could have been interpreted as a divine intervention, a sign from the gods urging the warring parties to lay down their arms. Alternatively, it could have been seen as a natural phenomenon, a rare astronomical event that simply coincided with the battle. Regardless of the interpretation, the eclipse’s impact is undeniable. It disrupted the established pattern of violence and created a space for peace talks to begin.
The story of the Battle of Halys River serves as a cautionary tale and a beacon of hope. It reminds us of the devastating consequences of war and the fragility of peace. Yet, it also highlights the potential for unforeseen events to create opportunities for reconciliation.
The Significance of Synchronicity
The story of Thales predicting the eclipse that halted the Battle of Halys River offers a possible case for synchronicity, a concept explored by Carl Jung. Synchronicity describes meaningful coincidences, where seemingly unrelated events (eclipse and battle) connect in a way that can’t be explained by simple cause and effect. The eclipse’s emotional impact on the warriors (awe, fear) strengthens the argument for a significant connection.
While the eclipse was a natural phenomenon, its timing and impact feel particularly meaningful. Jung acknowledged synchronicity doesn’t negate causality, but the coincidence disrupted the established pattern of violence and created space for peace. Unclear communication regarding Thales’ prediction weakens the argument for a purely unconscious connection, but the story remains an intriguing example of a meaningful coincidence with historical impact, aligning with some aspects of Jung’s concept.
In today’s world, fraught with tension and conflict, the story serves as a potent reminder of the importance of diplomacy and dialogue. While war can be a deliberate act with deep historical roots, peace negotiations offer a chance to break free from the cycle.
We should only be so lucky!
*
Rabbi Michael Leo Samuel is spiritual leader of Temple Beth Shalom in Chula Vista. He may be contacted via michael.samuel@sdjewishworld.com