UNITED NATIONS, N.Y. (WJC) — The Security Council of the United Nations is expected to vote Friday on an Arab-sponsored resolution text which condemns Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem. The vote was originally set for Wednesday, but postponed to let the 15 members of the council discuss it more. The draft resolution states: “Israeli settlements established in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, are illegal and constitute a major obstacle to the achievement of a just, lasting and comprehensive peace.”
The discussions were focused on the United States, which rejects the draft resolution and is likely to block the decision. According to the official all other 14 other members of the Security Council supported the draft resolution, which has been sponsored by 120 UN member states.
Meanwhile, Palestinian Foreign Affairs Minister Riad al-Malki said that Washington “would isolate itself” if it vetoed the resolution. “It would mean that America is against implementing international law when it comes to Israeli violations in the occupied Palestinian land,” he told ‘Voice of Palestine’ radio. He said the Obama administration had presented three compromise offers, but the Arabs had rejected them and requested the Security Council to convene for the vote. One US proposal was to send a fact-finding mission of council members to the Middle East to look thoroughly into the issue of settlements.
Major Jewish groups in the United States urged the Obama administration to veto the resolution. The Orthodox Union wrote an open letter to the US president, saying that “anything short of the United States casting a veto against a resolution containing such language would be a deviation from America’s historic support for Israel against assaults at the UN and, we suggest, counterproductive to your Administration’s interests and goals in the Middle East.”
*
RJC accuses Obama of ‘throwing Israel under the bus’
WASHINGTON, D.C. (Press Release)–
In a break with traditional American policy at the United Nations, the Obama administration this week offered to support a UN Security Council statement that condemns Israel’s settlement policies. That offer was reportedly meant as a compromise, so that the US would not have to veto a Security Council resolution being pushed by the Palestinian delegation that condemns Israel.
“The Administration’s position is to throw Israel under the bus,” RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks said. “Instead of supporting this statement, the American position should be to publicly defend Israel and veto the Palestinian-backed resolution.”
The United States has historically opposed UN Security Council actions that target Israel specifically. The Obama administration’s position represents a break in this longstanding tradition.
The offer to support the anti-Israel statement also marks a shift in position by the Obama administration. A week ago Deputy Secretary of State Jim Steinberg told the House Foreign Affairs Committee that the UN Security Council was the wrong venue to address the issue of settlements. This week, the administration said it would support a Security Council statement that faults Israel.
Republicans aren’t alone in criticizing the administration’s approach. New York Democrat Anthony Weiner said yesterday, “This is too clever by half. Instead of doing the correct and principled thing and vetoing an inappropriate and wrong resolution, they now have opened the door to more and more anti-Israeli efforts coming to the floor of the U.N. The correct venue for discussions about settlements and the other aspects of a peace plan is at the negotiating table. Period.”
*
Preceding articles supplied by World Jewish Congress and Republican Jewish Coalition